← Aaron Magnan, Ed.D.

Draft

Using AI at Our School: A Guide for Staff

AI tools are already in our classrooms, in our inboxes, on our students' devices, and in their homes. Much of it is invisible: it's built into search, games, photo apps, and the videos our students watch, whether anyone chose it or not. Our students are young, and what's fine for a high schooler may not be right for a second grader, so the question is never just whether a tool works but whether it fits the child in front of you. This guide tells you how to use AI here without putting a student's information or a student's work at risk. It follows the district's draft board policy on artificial intelligence in instruction and our existing acceptable use rules. The policy sets the rules. This guide explains how to follow them day to day.

If anything here seems to conflict with the policy, follow the policy. If a situation isn't covered, ask before you try it.

One way to think about it

It helps to picture AI learning as a ladder with seven rungs, from knowing AI exists up through experimenting, analyzing, understanding, collaborating, contributing, and creating. Nobody climbs the whole ladder in elementary school, and nobody should. Our students spend most of their time on the first three rungs, with short visits to the others, and that's where the Common Sense Media lessons we already teach do their work.

7 Creating with AI Making something new 6 Contributing with AI Making things other people use 5 Collaborating with AI Working with it on a task 4 Understanding AI Explaining how it works 3 Analyzing AI Is that true? Where did it guess? 2 Experimenting with AI Trying an approved tool with a teacher beside you 1 Knowing AI It's a machine, not a person. It can be wrong. TK–1 2–3 4–6
Adapted from The AI Engagement Ladder, Aaron Magnan, Ed.D.

The upper rungs show up in elementary school too, but at a basic level. A fourth grader using Canva's AI to make an image for a poster is creating with AI. A class dictating a story to Copilot and fixing what it gets wrong is collaborating with it. Both are fine, and this is part of why the approved list matters. When the tool is district-approved, students can go further up the ladder without you worrying about where their words and pictures end up. In middle school and beyond, students spend more time on the upper rungs and go deeper. In elementary school, they get an introduction.

Which tools you can use

The district keeps a list of approved AI tools in the teacher portal and the principal portal. Check it before you use a tool for school work, and check it again before you let students use one. The list will grow as new tools are reviewed.

Right now the list includes:

If a tool isn't on the list, it isn't approved, even if it's free, even if another district uses it, and even if a student brought it in. To request a tool, submit a Zendesk ticket to ESSC. Reviews take time, so ask early.

Before students use an AI tool

Ask four questions about any tool before students touch it:

  1. Is it on the district's approved list? If not, stop here. No exceptions for student use.
  2. Does it keep or share student information outside district systems?
  3. Does the student need their own account with an outside company?
  4. Can people outside the district see what students type or what the tool produces?

Our annual technology agreement covers tools the district runs inside its own systems. If the answer to question 2, 3, or 4 is yes, send the district's additional consent form home before students use it. If all three are no, the annual agreement covers you.

Protecting student information

Students never enter personal information into an AI tool. Not their name, not a classmate's name, not an address, phone number, or anything else that identifies a real person. Teach this the way you teach not sharing a password.

For staff, the rule has two parts:

Personal information includes a name, address, email, phone number, student ID, and anything else that could identify a specific person. If you're unsure whether something counts, treat it as if it does.

AI and student work

You decide whether students may use AI on an assignment, and you write that decision on the assignment. "No AI on this one" and "You may use Copilot to brainstorm, but the writing has to be yours" are both clear. If you say nothing, students will make their own rules.

Work a student turns in as their own has to be their own. AI-generated writing or answers submitted as original work is plagiarism under our existing technology policy and is handled the same way, unless you permitted that use. When you do permit it, tell students how to show what the tool did and what they did.

Three things never to do

Everything in our acceptable use rules about harmful, threatening, or harassing content applies to AI the same way it applies to everything else. Students are held to these same rules, and you are the one who teaches them.

What you can do today

If no student information is involved, you can use Copilot right now for your own work. Some places to start:

Read everything it produces before you use it. These tools are confident and sometimes wrong, and your name is on what goes home.

Who to ask

This guide will be updated as the approved list changes and as the district's AI policy is adopted.